Métodos de tiroglobulina de primera y segunda generación: su utilidad en pacientes con cáncer diferenciado de tiroides / First and second generation thyroglobulin measurement methods: Their usefulness in patients with thyroid cancer

El cáncer diferenciado de tiroides (CDT) es el cáncer endocrinológico más frecuente y en las últimas décadas su incidencia ha aumentado. El seguimiento de la enfermedad se efectúa con la medición de tiroglobulina (Tg) sérica, ecografía cervical y barrido corporal total diagnóstico. Los métodos de Tg han evolucionado a través del tiempo. Actualmente, los ensayos inmunométricos de Tg se clasifican en 1.ª y 2.ª generación (1.ª G y 2.ª G). Comprobamos que los ensayos de 2.ª G alcanzan una precisión adecuada para medir valores del orden de 0,1 ng/ml y los de 1.ª G de 1 ng/ml. La bibliografía señala que en el caso de los pacientes de bajo riesgo, una Tg bajo levotiroxina indetectable por un método de 2.ª G puede evitar la realización de Tg estimulada, sea por la suspensión de la terapia hormonal como por el empleo de la TSH recombinante humana, debido a su mayor sensibilidad. Sin embargo, por su menor especificidad, un valor detectable no asegura la presencia de enfermedad, y debería confirmarse. Para optimizar la utilidad clínica de dicha medición se podrían emplear valores de cortes de acuerdo con la población y el método en lugar de la sensibilidad funcional o límite de cuantificación del mismo. Se señalan también otros aspectos críticos en la medición de Tg como son la discordancia entre distintas metodologías y las interferencias en su medición, principalmente por anticuerpos antitiroglobulina. En presencia de interferencias pierden utilidad los ensayos de Tg de 1.ª y 2.ª G. El seguimiento de los pacientes con Tg interferida tiene limitaciones todavía no resueltas. Es importante consensuar entre médicos y bioquímicos las dificultades técnicas y los criterios de interpretación de los valores de Tg en el seguimiento de los pacientes con CDT.

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine cancer (tumour) and its incidence has risen in the past decades. Its follow-up includes measuring serum thyroglobulin (Tg), performing neck ultrasound and a diagnostic whole-body scan. Tg assays have evolved with time. At present immunoassays for Tg are classified as 1 st and 2 nd generation assays (1 st G and 2 nd G). 2 nd G assays show an adequate (good) precision at levels close to 0.1 ng/ml and 1 st G assays at levels close to 1 ng/ml. The literature shows that for low risk patients on levothyroxine treatment, who undetectable levels by 2 aG assays can avoid the stimulation test performed by thyroid hormone withdrawal or after recombinant human TSH, due to better sensitivity. However, due to lower specificity, detectable levels do not confirm the presence of disease (tumour), and should be confirmed. To optimise the clinical usefulness of the test, cut-off values specific for population and method should be used, instead of functional sensitivity or quantification limit. Critical issues for measuring Tg are discussed, such as non-harmonisation of methods, and interferences, mainly by antithyroglobulin antibodies (ATg). 1 st and 2 nd G assays are less useful in presence of ATg, and follow up of such patients is limited. Consensus between physicians and the laboratory on technical issues and interpretation criteria of Tg values is of outmost importance in the follow-up of DTC patients.

Adequate levothyroxine doses for the treatment of hypothyroidism newly discovered during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines recommend thyrotropin (TSH) target levels of ≤2.5 mIU/L for the first trimester and ≤3 mIU/L for the subsequent trimesters. Euthyroidism should be attained as soon as possible, but there are no precise indications about the initial levothyrorine (LT4) dose. The aim of our study was to determine the appropriate LT4 doses in order to normalize TSH levels in patients with newly discovered subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) during pregnancy, and to correlate them with basal TSH levels. The adequate LT4 doses for women with SCH were also compared to those required in pregnant women with overt hypothyroidism (OH). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with newly diagnosed hypothyroidism during pregnancy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned to group 1 (n = 64) with SCH or group 2 (n = 13) with OH. SCH patients were subdivided into two groups: group 1a serum TSH >2.5 (1st trimester) or >3 (2nd or 3rd trimester) to 4.2 mIU/L; and group 1b TSH level > 4.21-10 mIU/L. All patients were treated with LT4 as soon as hypothyroidism was diagnosed. The dose that allowed a TSH of ≤2.5 mIU/L to be reached in the first trimester or one that allowed a TSH of ≤3 mIU/L to be reached during the second and third trimesters was considered the appropriate one. RESULTS: A significant difference (p < 0.0001) in the appropriate LT4 dose (mean ± SD, µg/kg/day) was observed between group 1 and group 2: 1.31 ± 0.36 versus 2.33 ± 0.59. Patients in group 1a required a significantly lower LT4 dose (p < 0.014) than group1b: 1.20 ± 0.39 versus 1.42 ± 0.31 µg/kg/day. In 57 of the 64 (89.06%) women with SCH and in 10/13 (76.92%) women with OH, the appropriate LT4 dose coincided with the initial dose. Only 11% and 23% respectively required additional adjustments. Once the appropriate dose of LT4 was prescribed, the time at which euthyroidism (mean ± SD, weeks) was confirmed was similar in patients with SCH (6.06 ± 3.3) and OH (5.3 ± 1.8). There were no miscarriages or premature deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: When hypothyroidism is newly discovered during pregnancy, we suggest initiating the treatment with the following LT4 doses: 1.20 µg/kg/day for SCH with TSH ≤ 4.2 mIU/L, 1.42 µg/kg/day with TSH > 4.2-10, and 2.33 µg/kg/day for OH. By taking this approach, patients will promptly attain the euthyroid state avoiding additional increments and, probably, obstetric risks.

[Body weight increase and quality of semen: a controversial association]. / Aumento del peso corporal y calidad seminal: una asociación controvertida.

BACKGROUND: Infertility is a public health disorder affecting 10% of the population worldwide. Research on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on male fertility is very limited as compared to the multiple studies evaluating the impact of overweight in women's fertility. Although 25%-30% of the cases of couples consulting for infertility are attributable to male factors, studies evaluating the association between semen parameters and BMI are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of BMI on semen parameters in a selected group of men with unexplained infertility. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 168 patients during the 2008-2010 period. They all had at least one semen analysis and related studies to rule out known causes of infertility. Median age of patients was 35 years (22-55), and they were divided into three groups: normal weight (BMI: 20-24.9kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-29.9kg/m(2)), and obese (BMI ≥30kg/m(2)). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in semen parameters evaluated between the three groups, and no significant correlation was found between the same parameters and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant association between BMI and conventional semen parameters, but we cannot exclude an impairment in other semen parameters that are not routinely assessed, which could result in a lower potential fertility in these individuals.